A Fraud That Took Me By Surprise

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Last Saturday night we were staying at a hotel that we commonly go to in order to unwind about 15 miles from home. I was on my computer and all of a sudden I received an alert from my bank for a charge of $131.52 from Pizza Hut!

We went over to the local Pizza hut about 6 blocks down the road to find out about this charge. The manager who was extremely nice and helpful from Bonham, TX went through her receipts and found no such charge. She then looked at the store number on the alert and found out the store that the charge came from was in Henderson, Nevada a thousand miles away from us!

The wife called Henderson, Nevada Pizza Hut and spoke with some goof that would havee the maanager call me back. Once called back from the manager, they were told this was a fraudulent charge and they needed to refund me back on my business card and that I had made a claim with my bank’s fraud department. Pizza Hut refused to refund us!

Because of Huricane Harvey, our bank had limited services that Saturday night. I could not transfer my money to another account I had and this debit card was the only one I had money on. I could not cancel the card at the time.

After this punk stuffed himself with pizza, he needed to go to Las Vegas to get something to drink at 2 am, ($183.50), 3 am ($183.50) and 4 am ($133.00) at the Parkway Tavern. About 9 am, the wife drew out all the remaing money out of the account and I cancelled the card.

I notified the bank fraud department about the additional fradulent charges. They were sending me a new debit card and everything was supposedly handled. At least that was until Tuesday morning. The $131 had now turned into $157. The $183 charges were now $220 overdrafing the account by $129! These additional charges were for non-payment from my bank.

I contacted the bank (again) and got in touch with the fraud department. Evidently, because of the weather related problems the bank had on Saturday and Sundy, a fraud report had not been issued on my account, even though they managed to prevent from paying those fraudulent charges.

Well, supposedly, everything is all straightened out an money should be back in my account within 12 hours.

I am very aware of how fraudsters work with insurance claims and that aware of all the crooks out there with theft and fraud.

I just never thought I would be a victim of fraud, even though we are warned about it all the time. Of course this is speculation, but is most likely what happened. The wife was in Dallas 3 weeks ago and stopped at a quick trip to get gas. I believe the card was kimmed at the pump. A bogus debit card is created with my name and numbers and sold.This was not a personal card, but a business card. In Vegas, it is very common to be asked for an ID that matches the card, so someone probably has a fake driver’s licence with my name on it and possibly the perps photo.

What was so frustrating is that calling the Henderson PD at the time, they could have possibly caught this guy, but because I am not a resident there, there is nothing they would do. They told me to report it to my local police department and then the would work with Hederson. My wife spoke with our police chief. He knows us well. He said no, that is Henderson’s job and I agree. Bottom line–thieves get away with this because the cops are too lazy to seek out crime in my opinion.

I put this article up to make people aware that this can happen to them! Some of the skimmers used at the pumps and ATMs are so slick, even a pro would have a hard time picking up on it. These skimmers are available for low cost on the Internet, just like Transponder key programmers are to bypass a vehicle’s anti-theft system. Thieves are always ahead of the game! Just do a search on the Internet for Gas pump skimming or ATM skimmers. It should scare you! You can also have your credit card information stolen electronically from your wallet with RFID readers. Nothing is secure anymore and one has to be aware!

To prevent skimming, don’t pay at the pump and pay the cashier.

Unfortunately, instead of having the ability to track down real crimes, most cops are stuck with baby sitting and trying to keep one spouse from killing another in domestic violence issues. DVs take up a lot of any departments time.

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

What Do I Require For An Expert in My Auto Theft Claim Denial Case?

If you have an auto theft claim denial case, in order to convince a jury that the Certified Forensic Locksmith that determined  the reported stolen vehicle was last driven with a key of the proper type, is incompetent  and cannot be believed.

These cases can be complex and your expert needs the capability of knowing the experts he is opposing.

The optimal situation is if e has opposed the experts before.

If he has depositions and/or trial testimony of theirs.

If he has reports of theirs, where a pattern can be laid out that they shipped steps in their examinations and still had the same conclusions?

Do the CFLs have an error rating on their testing processes?

Is the expert capable of supplying hard hitting questions for your attorney to ask the CFLs?

Is the expert court savvy?

Has he been through a number of trials for plaintiffs?

Has he served as an expert for insurance companies?

Is he familiar with how the vehicle at hand can be stolen?

Is the expert fully informed on the forensic locksmithing process?

Has he ever published a very large training program on auto theft and forensics investigation, with the testing processes vetted by the FBI?

Is the expert trained in all aspects of manufacturing keys and locks?

Is the expert capable of being a car thief?

Does the expert have 37 years experience with auto theft?

Has tje expert defeated an unstealable transponder system with a strategically placed wire?

Has the expert got vehicle fire and defect experience?

Does the expert work for insurance companies?

Does the expert srrve a plaintiff?

Does the expert serve criminal defendants?

Does the expert serve the prosecution?

Has the expert ever shown his unbiased approach by being appointed an umpire by the courts.

Has the expert published over 50, books and articles on auto theft and forensics?

Has his career encompassed more than just examination of locks, transponder systems and auto theft?

Has he set up the industry standsrds for the examination of stolen vehicles?

 

Your expert needs to know everything about the auto theft SIU investigation and EUO preparation process in order to assist your attorney with bad faith.

 

If this is the type of expert you need to prevail in an auto theft claim denial case, we are the firm you need. There is no one else!

 

1-866-490-1673 ask for Rob

 

 

 

 

Auto Theft Claim SIU Investigation, EUO Specialist

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Source: Auto Theft Claim SIU Investigation, EUO Consultant. Court Qualified Auto Theft/Forensic Expert Witness. Serving 48 States.

 

1-866-490-1673

Cell-1-903-513-7808

Robo14@aol.com

Rob

 

I will break this down for simple understanding. SIU is the Special Investigation Unit.  With the claim being referred to the SIU, this means they are looking at the insured not as a auto theft victim anymore, but someone suspected as submitting a fraudulent claim. What’s that? You had nothing to do with the reported theft? That attitde falls on deaf ears! You are guilty and the investigator is going to prove it!

The investigator has no proof to this because it simply isn’t true! The investigator doesn’t need proof other than the independent certified forensic locksmith they contracted who is insinuating that it was the insured’s key that last drove the vehicle!

So the insured is being accused by an unknown person referred to as an “independent” certified forensic locksmith (CFL) that wrote a report on your vehicle (the vehicle does not even have to be recovered where he examined no physical evidence) indicating for a conclusion that the vehicle was last driven with a key of the proper type!

After your recorded statement, a number of facts (red flags a/k/a fraud indicators) were applied to the claim for the purpose of referring it to the SIU. The investigator went to the vendor list and assigned the claim to a CFL.

What is interesting here, is the investigator hand-picked the CFL, and the insured was never given the opportunity to have an expert representing them at the time of the CFL report. Why not? Does the insurance company have something to hide?

This is a process. Once the CFL has submitted his report, whether he examined the vehicle, keys, ignition, interrogated the computer and indicates the vehicle was last driven with a key for the vehicle, the investigator now has the green light for a full blown investigation on the insured. The insured’s involvement does not have to proven. The case being built is based on not what it is, but what it appears to be.

A good example for financial motivation goes like this: The vehicle was recovered a total loss. The insured might owe $28,000 on a vehicle worth $20,000.00. This is known as upside down in the vehicle. Now, let’s say the insured has gap insurance. Gap insurance picks up the difference from what is owed to the actual cash value of the vehicle.

The investigator will claim that the insured could not afford the payments and had the vehicle made into a total loss, so all the insured is responsible for is the deductible and the insured can walk away from any financial liability.

In another situation, let’s say the value of the vehicle is $60,000 and nott recovered. The motivation would be that insured has an astronomical amount of debt, and the insured’s motivation is that they would receive $60,000.00 cash! However, the one fact that the insurance company leaves out is the insured doesn’t get the cash as portrayed and the funds would go to the lien holder!

Insurance fraud is a major problem. I stand by the carriers in their investigations and have no bias against them. I commend the SIU.

The problem though is it is also common for an overzealous investigator to paint all insured’s with the same brush!

Sometimes the investigators put too much faith in their certified forensic locksmiths. I have pointed it out so often, commonly in court that the CFL in my opinion is being deceptive and giving the reader of his reports the false impression that because of their great forensic abilities, they are determining the last specific key used. What they are saying in their reports on recovered thefts, recovered stolen and burned and not recovered is the same exact conclusion of key of the proper type.

There was no scientific or technical skill required to reach this conclusion, but because they are using the badge of forensics, they must be able to determine the last key used. Are these reports specifying the insured’s first and every day use key? No! Are they saying the vehicle was last driven with the insured’s second key? No! Are they saying that the vehicle was last driven with a thief’s key? No! Yet, every one of these examples is a key of the proper type.

One might say that a newly cut key would leave fresh tool marks. How do they know this for a fact? This assumes that a newly cut key will have rough edges and will drag across the wafer lands (Where the key Rides). A competent locksmith and a thief don’t want problems inserting or removing a key, so they will buff all the rough edges. A smooth key is not going to leave any marks. That is simple common sense!

Even though the inventor (who is now retired) of the last key used process from the 90’s has stated in depositions, for a key to create wear patterns, it has to be inserted at least 500 times!

When it comes to the SIU investigation, one has to be very careful truthfully answering the questions! The investigator is convinced the insured has submitted a fraudulent claim, and this is not the time the insured should be defending themselves!

We consult the insured, letting them know up front, what type of loaded questions are going to be asked and how to truthfully address them. We are not lawyers and don’t give legal advice. However, we have given hundreds of hours of sworn testimony. We also prepare the insured for an EUO (Examination Under Oath).

We have over 20 years working with SIUs and we know the process extremely well.

If you are under an Auto Theft SIU investigation, give us a call!

1-866-490-1673

Cell 1-903-513-7808

Rob

http://www.autotheftexpert.com

http://www.autotheftclaimsmaster.com

Serve 50 states. Distance not a problem with investigation consultation. Everything is done through  phone and email.

 

Referrences.

 

 

 

 

Auto theft claim siu investigation, EUO Auto Theft/Forensic Locksmith Expert Witness.

Tags

, , , ,

1-866-490-1673

http://www.autotheftexpert.com

http://www.autotheftclaimsmaster.com

Unlike the forensic locksmiths serving insurance industry as experts, I serve anyone looking for the truth. Whether for insurance defense, prosecution, plaintiff or criminal defense attorneys.

Except for a small number of insurance companies, I have been shut out by insurance companies for only one reason: I dare be unbiased and serve anyone. Insurance companies like Progressive quit using my services in 1997 when I opposed one of their experts.

Allstate quit using me in 2000 because aTennessee plaintiff attorney named me as his expert without my permission and without being retained.

Yes, investigators will say they want an unbiased expert, of course as long as you don’t take a case against an insurance company!